Hello, Manuel. Many thanks for your support.
I've fixed the problems and now I'm providing unsigned source and binary packages at http://www.mentebinaria.com.br/coding40/pev_0.22-r2.tar.gz I think it's enough to get reviews, right? Before upload, I know that I need to sign both .dsc and .changes files. Cheers, @Fernando Mercês <http://twitter.com/FernandoMerces> Linux Registered User #432779 www.mentebinaria.com.br http://linuxreversing.org http://softwarelivre-rj.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Participe do I Hack'n Rio <http://hacknrio.org/>, dias 8 e 9 de abril na UFRJ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2011/1/11 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]> > Hello Fernando, > > First of all I am no "mentor", just a regular package, and don't have years > of experience with this, but I'll review your package anyway. Hopefully > something else gets interested and helps to review it, too. > > On Tuesday 11 January 2011 08:00:39 Fernando Mercês wrote: > > Hello, mentors. > > I would appreciate if you can look at my package and tell me if is > > something wrong. Will be my first package. > > The package name is pev and the tarball can be downloaded on > > http://www.mentebinaria.com.br/coding40/pev_0.22-1.tar.gz > > Thanks. > > The contents of the debian/ directory look more or less fine, save for the > following details: > > - The files "files" and "pev.debhelper.log" which, as far as I known, are > unnecessary. > > - The changelog should contain the name of a distribution -- "unstable" by > default. > > > But what you should really get done for future versions/revisions is to > present to this mailing list the source and maybe binary packages (as built > by "debuild"). > > > Cheers, and congratulations for your first package :) > -- > Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]> >
