On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:27:36 -0600, Alex Rousskov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/03/2011 03:36 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > >> /* Web Polygraph http://www.web-polygraph.org/ > >> * (C) 2003-2006 The Measurement Factory > >> * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 */ > > > Here you are in fact certainly lacking sufficient information, because (C) > > is > > not generally equivalent to "Copyright" under all copyright laws. > > We will change "(C)" to "Copyright". > > > On 04/03/2011 03:52 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > > I have looked at licensecheck. It matches the following regexp: > > > > /under the Apache License, Version ([^ ]+) \(the License\)/ > > > > Changing "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" line to > > "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License)" makes > > licensecheck detect both license and copyright correctly. IMO the > > licensecheck regexp should be improved. > > I do not know whether licensecheck does some relevant preprocessing, but > the above regex would not even match the recommended raw preamble > because the recommended preamble quotes the second License: > > > Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); >
Apparently, it does. Because the recommended preamble is recognized. > Since the stuff in parenthesis is meant for the following text which may > not be present in many customized preambles, it should not be matched > for, IMHO, > Agreed. I openned a bug for devscripts #620902 [1]. Regards, Dmitry [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620902 > Cheers, > > Alex. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
