The Fungi <[email protected]> wrote on 2011-04-12 17:40: > While admittedly more recognizable for users of Western calendars, > an 8-digit ISO 8601esque datestamp is fairly low-density. With only > a couple more digits, you can have epoch seconds as your version > timestamp (as upstream, I actually just do 0.0.<epoch of commit> for > snapshots of some of my not-yet-ready-for-release projects). Just > remember that they'd need to do more than release "something larger > than 0.0.1" to edge out 0.0.<bignumber>... something on the order of > 0.1.x would be needed.
Does you mean, that you don't use a special git-number, but instead the timestamp of the git commit? E.g. 0.0.20110412+1204-1 for timestamp with date 2011-04-12 and time 12:04 or 0.0.201104121204-1 for timestamp with date 2011-04-12 and time 12:04 --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
