-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sebastien,
I took a brief look in your package (however I can't sponsor you anyway). On 10.05.2011 16:33, [email protected] wrote: > * License : Apache 2 Section * You claim it would be licensed GPL-3 in your debian/copyright file. Please fix this to indicate, whatever applies to your project (as you are upstream as well). While fixing you could use DEP-5 as well [1]. * Your package FTBS, e.g. see: STDERR date: invalid date `Fr 23. Sep 03:52:49 CEST 1983'$ STDERR datediff: error(s) reported$ STATUS 1 ASSERT <status eq 0> ERROR assertion <status eq 0> failed FAILED test_random_dates make[1]: *** [/home/arno/foo/scriptutils-1.4.0/target/test/datediff.passed] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/arno/foo/scriptutils-1.4.0' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-check] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 * Your control file is incomplete. Please add a more verbose description and put some actual content to the synopsis. Remember, the synopsis line is a very short description to advertise what your program is about. Make it as useful as possible to the reader * VCS-* fields should point to the Debian VCS where the package is managed, not upstream, even if this is your own project. * Your standards version is outdated, please bump to 3.9.2 * I fail to see, why your package would need priority "standard". See [2]. Moreover this is a policy violation as of § 2.5 since your dependencies have lower priorities (e.g. gawk). * Your debian/changelog is incomplete (dude, you didn't even even replace the bug #XXXXX template) * Your debian/docs looks wrong. Maybe you wanted to put a newline between the entries. * You miss man pages for some of your utilities, the existing ones are mostly incomplete. * Your patches are pointless. If you consider this a bug, fix it upstream but don't change your local source tarball data without good reason. By the way: The DEP-3 header puts in there automatically, aren't supposed to keep as they are. Fill out the suggested fields [3]. In fact it is considered a bad style relying on the quilt package format to track your changes. Also they shouldn't probably named after your Ubuntu PPA version ... * You miss a watch file [4]. * There are perhaps more thing to add, but I could not build your package. [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities [3] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ [4] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianwatch - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNyV6dAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtdCkP/1u2QFIMBLnS3rwhZJG8k6fm 8gAwVyyp+ssiDW320C4eo9fiPKmFbSFTumyKjBFNxXn6Qb0LspUobs4r/JuQ/273 uLJ9BDhxlEqbq+76oV5LLBeFCAEztWsBQMmPN/XjKqiN9xzXtPsJlKOVpWbF/3Pk UvMuoz6BRKKcDQ3utvttyadar4SIS56JS0NW6iBI9keO6ixO9+g0Kz/LneCZA+l0 g1elczUqhjTU0oN1rVH2iSEC/zwLA4zjWeO+5QitmInOgPn7dloZUMzsGgYJJikB 6IKrC9rA57yfqfRCGYuAIc4jW57PE9UmqMkoXA9akI7vx7EpOi4svEIDnpAr/lCo d+3njGG2A34ZFEgEdbXn125N+cbbpcuQguXiQqobFVTrVscXK5D2Cs1LnB2kWUtK gvwSvtJb/r8VBruPKVytpfbwcL8Nlnw4mxURzVwtocIzVAKovuVdqeUF2cbyKcKb aXhslMKGNfW54J9dcZv2wyKyQKtHR/sko3A/NseefQTbKlCWoUK689R/QM588uqz bAMQNS5nQXWM1Nh+hkBK5A7CEDw8Oxrx37BBCT4uyOLsdE2z966VKh2u5cuS8BvU SE9y2o8FRutgzlSO+HM1GXGQHJj2yo3AnkSE38CfKpauKtpP23yymMP+yuC4f+bV 1in6cVIp7MD756Wc/1kZ =ozH9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
