On 05/13/2011 10:56 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 01:31 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 05/08/2011 08:42 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>>> The package is lintian clean, and builds in pbuilder.
>> Actually, It's not:
>>
>> W: kildclient source: format-3.0-but-debian-changes-patch
>>
>> debian/patches/debian-changes-2.11.0-1 contains the changes from overwriting
>> configu.guess. You can use the the scripts from autotools-dev to perform this
>> task for you. Have a look at dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig(1) and
>> dh_autotools-dev_restoreconfig(1).
>
> That's strange, I could not get this warning with lintian 2.5.0 (just
> installed from unstable). And I see no patches for config.{sub,guess} in
> the kildclient_2.11.0-1.debian.tar.gz file, it only includes the normal
> files in debian/
>
> But I'll take a look at the mentioned tools nevertheless.I forgot to mention that I get the diff after the first build. So maybe your /usr/share/misc/config.sub matches the one shipped with kildclient and mine doesn't. Mine is from autotools-dev 20110511.1 where as kildclient's seems to match that one from autotools-dev 20100122.1. So it's worth to be fixed anyway as you'll get a diff with any newer autotools-dev. > Anyway, if some DD is thinking about uploading this package, please > wait. I've submitted a quick fix for the FTBS bug 555000 to Dominic > Hargreaves as per his offer in that bug report, so I'll prepare a new > version soon. > >> And concerning the dpkg-shlibdeps warnings you could consider linking with >> -Wl,--as-needed. > > Is that the recommended way, or should I keep hoping that one day the > pkg-config files for gtk+ will not list so many libraries as > dependencies (that aren't really dependencies)? I don't know if that's the recommended way but that's what I am using in zathura to get rid of those warnings. Kind regards, -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
