* Paul Boddie <[email protected]>, 2011-06-25, 18:46:
http://packages.boddie.org.uk/dists/lenny/paul/source/shedskin_0.8-1.dsc
Err, lenny? I hope you understand that you are supposed to build and test your packages in unstable, not oldstable. :)
With regard to package quality, I think only a few policy-related changes need to be made.
The correct course of action would be to fix them first, and _then_ request sponsorship. The lintian report looks pretty bad: W: shedskin source: dh_pycentral-is-obsolete line 52 W: shedskin source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends shedskin I: shedskin source: missing-debian-source-format W: shedskin source: build-depends-on-python-dev-with-no-arch-any P: shedskin source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system setup.py and 3 more W: shedskin source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch W: shedskin source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep W: shedskin source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.2) I: shedskin source: debian-watch-file-is-missing P: shedskin: no-upstream-changelog P: shedskin: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL I: shedskin: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright P: shedskin: no-homepage-field -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
