> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:55 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > [...] but should be made explicit as the reasons not to use dh, for > example, might mean that the helper is lacking functionality or > behaves buggy in certain situations.
I don't get it here... Do you think that debian/rules calling the emacs debhelper when it's not needed 99.9999% of the times is a superior way to do packaging? Or is using something fully automated where you don't have to think or understand what's going on a better way to do things? In what way not using dh has to be justified at all? I'd rather say the opposite way! I really don't think that dh is "state-of-the-art" (as Arno is saying later on in this thread). Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
