On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 02:57:20PM -0700, Hamish wrote: > +dfsg into version name: > as our build will be bit-for-bit identical to one built from a non- > stripped version of the source (the only difference between the > source tarballs being unused mac/windows dirs), I don't see a > point in adding the +dfsg to the binary package version, it > clutters for no reason. (if pbuilder method has issues, then fix > pbuilder...)
Does anybody have a clue if it will build by autobuilder fine? When debian changelog lists version 2.4.708 and corresponding tarball is opencpn_2.4.708+dfsg.orig.tar.gz since some non-dfsg binaries has been stripped off. E.g. pbuilder fails to find the tarball unless version in changelog is changed to 2.4.708+dfsg. Thanks. -- Anton Martchukov http://www.martchukov.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
