Thanks Kilian I will create a repackaged source with a new version number 02.01.05-2, with the "looks" directory excluded. I will add a get-orig-source target that creates the repackaged source, and try to conform with Debian developers Reference (6.7.8.2 Repackaged upstream source). At this time I will not change the upstream source.
Peter On 7/26/2011 12:29 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: >> Am 26.07.2011 16:32, schrieb Peter Bennett: >>> The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are >>> present in the source because I do >>> distribute them with the Windows version of jampal. >>> Jampal runs fine without them, and some of them are available as >>> separate packages in Debian, so the >>> user can install them if he wants to. >>> What do I need to do about this? Do I need a repackaged source? >> yes, that would be an option. > I guess that would be one preferred method. Or as you're upstream yourself > you can as well leave the compiled *.jar out of any release tarball and > compile them as part of the windows build process. Alternatively you can > ship them in the *.zip for Windows and leave them excluded in the *.tar.gz > for Linux. > > Which one you prefer is up to you. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
