On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:30:55 +0300 "Andrew O. Shadoura" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:19:44 +0100 > Tony Houghton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > roxterm-legacy: binaries compiled and linked with GTK2 > > roxterm: binaries compiled and linked with GTK3 > > roxterm-common: All the other files > > An off-topic question: why've you chosen this naming scheme? Why > 'legacy'? In particular, I'm not going to switch to GTK+3 any time > soon, and guess I'm not alone, so it can't be legacy, I think. I'm glad you asked TBH, because I wasn't happy about that name either. I think I might use the name roxterm-gtk2 instead. To make it easier for people who want to stay with GTK2 I could either add a line to the GTK3 one's description referring to the GTK2 version or rename the GTK3-based package too, eg to roxterm-gtk3. In the latter case would adding "Replaces: roxterm" cause it to automatically replace roxterm at apt-get upgrade (or only dist-upgrade?) or would I have to make a meta-package? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110818003937.6f2465f0@junior
