Hi, > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "snes9x". > > > > what does snes9x have, that is not provided by zsnes? > ZSNES is fine, fast and highly stable. I happily used it for years. It'd > be perfectly acceptable, except for the fact that it uses i386 assembly > and therefore isn't portable.
that is a good reason. I CC your mail to the debian-games team, which also sponsors zsnes. I am sure you can find a sponsor there. You also might want to join the team. > As far as I can tell (I'm sure you can tell me more!), ZSNES hasn't had > an update since 2007. I think that's right, however zsnes is still in development. > Although I am a native English speaker, so I have no experience, ZSNES > has no translations that I can see, whereas the GTK version of snes9x > has five translations. > > I feel that the GTK interface is nicer than the DOS-esque one of ZSNES, > but I'll admit that's a personal preference. > > I hope this explains my reasons for trying to re-package it. Best regards, -- eshat cakar web: www.eshat.de gpg-id: 799B 95D5 gpg-fingerprint: D59E 3B77 8662 D221 0900 D758 9D0F C2C1 799B 95D5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
