On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Roger Leigh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25:27AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2011-11-10 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> > I have been trying to split indep operations from the rest on the >> > activiz.net package, see: >> > >> > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/activiz.net/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup >> > >> > However the -indep rules are still being called on the buildd machine: >> > >> > Eg: >> > >> > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=activiz.net&arch=s390x&ver=5.6.1-2&stamp=1320869304 >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > Am I missing something here ? >> >> This is one of the real issue behind the optional build-arch/build-indep >> targets; since they are optional dpkg-buildpackage/buildds do not use >> them. Therefore, you cannot rely on them as a maintainer (yet). > [...] > > Agreed with all Niels comments. Your source package is fine; the issue > is that dpkg-buildpackage (run by sbuild on the buildds) calls: > > debian/rules build > debian/rules binary-arch > > when it should be running > debian/rules build-arch > debian/rules binary-arch > > I wrote a patch to fix this some time back, and it was discussed by the > TC months ago. I guess it needs chasing up to get it applied. Once > that's done, it will Just Work.
buildd can make the decision to run build-indep, I am ok with it. What I am not ok with, is when buildd are setup to run build-indep rules, but do not respect B-D-I ! That does not make any sense for me. Anyway I have merged B-D-I into B-D, as suggested. And -2 seems to compile just fine -well almost I need to B-D on doxygen-latex- Thanks, -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+7wuswji_xhh5w2wobpdbg2-czynqzgyk8retufr_cxqz6...@mail.gmail.com
