Hello I do not have any objection unbundling the ARPACK. The ARPACK can be easily built on MinGW platform.
Regards Tatsuro --- On Thu, 2011/12/1, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 16 November 2011 04:32, bastien ROUCARIES > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le Tuesday 8 November 2011 23:47:56, Thomas Weber a écrit : > >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:21:16PM +0100, roucaries bastien wrote: > >> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > BTW do you need help on arpack ? > >> > >> Opps, thanks for pointing me at this. I had totally forgotten about > >> arpack being bundled. > > > > Do you need help ? Do you need a new upstream ? > > I forgot to mention this. It's been a crazy month for me, forgive me. > > During the 2011 GSoC mentor summit, I briefly worked with Sylvester to > merge the Scilab and Octave versions of ARPACK. The result is here: > > http://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/arpack-ng/ > > We need to make more noise about this, but ARPACK is now officially > forked! Collaboratively maintained too. > > Octave people: can we unbundle ARPACK now? Perhaps even in time for > the 3.6 release? > > - Jordi G. H. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
