On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Christian Welzel wrote: > currently i try to get my typo3 packages into shape, so the > new version gets accepted by ftp-masters.
Please send a mail to this list when you have a package ready, I would like to help you audit it for embedded code copies and sourceless stuff. > There is a problem with modules, that are embedded into the > upstream tar-ball, but do not get distributed with the binary > packages (they get replaced by symlinks to debian-packages). > ftpmasters require that these licenses get included into the > copyright file. I want to avoid this, because the modules > dont find their way to the enduser. Is it ok, that i name > the package +dfsg and remove those unneeded parts from the > source tar-ball during a repacking step? It is acceptable to repack tarballs for this readon. Unless you are removing non-free stuff from the upstream tarball, +dfsg is an misleading thing to add to the version. Instead use +ds (Debian source) or +repack or something else. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6FQzEmoTQjfW=ioqdudj3fbvpc4jkapk6skl2khz46...@mail.gmail.com
