Hallo Artur, thanks for your quick response.
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 13:17 +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > Tobias, > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > > The one warning -- empty-debian-diff -- is emitted as I also keep the debian > > files in the git repository I use for development of solarpowerlog. > > Naturally > > the diff is empty in this case. > > If you are also the upstream developer and you are planning to always keep > Debian package with released version in sync, you can consider making the > package as a native package. Yes, this is how I'd like to manage it. I'm upstream and also debian is my build-target of choice (I'm only using debian since 7..8 yrs). > Technically, you indicate it by not adding > the -debianversion suffix into version number. In such case debian diff > shall be empty. > However, in this case, any change only in debian packaging would require > to release new version of your software. This is ok for me. > I have two small utilities for I am also an upstream developer and I prefer > to keep the sources free of Debian packaging stuff. > Well, I'd like to keep them together as I am using more than one computer for development I love that a single git-pull will update everything. So if it is ok to go native I will change the repository to refect this tonight. Regards, coldtobi > Regards > Artur -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
