Christian, I tested a binary package: it does'nt work and I must restore the build-stamp. I corrected also the copyright file I sent again the stuff, hoping that this last dput will be treated.
(Also, the binary package is available here :http://pecita.eu/unstable/fonts-pecita_3.2-3_all.deb) -------- Message original -------- Sujet: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Sponsor for the Font "Pecita" Date : Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:01:49 +0100 De : Maison en a Pecita <[email protected]> Pour : Christian PERRIER <[email protected]> Copie à : [email protected], [email protected] TY Christian for the time that you spent on my package. I sent a correction, as follow... 1) Lintian My understanding of English let me looking these sentences as Chinese. I modified version and description. 2) /usr/share/fonts/opentype/pecita: yes, true, done. 3) build-stamp: If you say! I suppressed it and hope the package is still instalable??? 4) I give the source on http://pecita.eu/f/Pecita.sfd but there is no connotation with the package. I hope it suits you: "je suis au taquet'. Do not ask me anything more :§ Regards, Philippe Cochy Le 22/12/2011 20:11, Christian PERRIER a écrit : > Quoting Maison en a Pecita ([email protected]): >> Hello. >> >> I am looking for a Sponsor for my font. > A few comments: > > - you may want to fix the current lintian warnings: > > W: fonts-pecita source: native-package-with-dash-version > W: fonts-pecita source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch > W: fonts-pecita source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep > W: fonts-pecita source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.2) > E: fonts-pecita: helper-templates-in-copyright > W: fonts-pecita: extended-description-line-too-long > W: fonts-pecita: extended-description-line-too-long > W: fonts-pecita: maintainer-script-empty prerm > W: fonts-pecita: maintainer-script-empty preinst > W: fonts-pecita: maintainer-script-empty postinst > > Most are "minor" but starting a package by being lintian-clean is a > good habit to have..:-). Most of these are easy to fix. > > I would also recommend using /usr/share/fonts/opentype/pecita instead > of /usr/share/fonts/opentype/fonts-pecita instead > > I also don't really understand the need for the following in > debian/rules: > > build-stamp: configure-stamp > dh_testdir > mkdir build > cd build; cp ../Pecita.otf ./ > > > Indeed, this package is a very good candidate for having a one-liner > dh7-style debian/rules. You may want to look at one of the many font > packages maintained by the team. > > Apart from these technical concerns, the font seems really > interesting. Do you intend to release the "source code" for it (I did > not find how you designed it)? I > think it is probably a very good case study for someone who would be > interested in creating a font. > > Vraiment très intéressant..:-) > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
