On 2012-01-28 17:14:46 +0100 (+0100), Christian Welzel wrote:
[...]
> flex-sdk is licensed unter MPL 1.1
[...]
It's actually the above assertion which is in question and in the
process of being verified, based on my reading.
> The problem is, that the MPL-licensed flex-sdk is not (yet) packaged
> for debian
[...]
And it appears the submitter of that ITP is in contact with Adobe as
of a few weeks ago to hopefully resolve contradictory licensing
statements. IF flex-sdk does turn out to be MPL as suggested, then
your package might be suitable for contrib until such time as
flex-sdk enters main. It would probably make more sense to just wait
and see how that discussion with Adobe plays out first though.
--
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); PGP(43495829);
WHOIS(STANL3-ARIN); SMTP([email protected]); FINGER([email protected]);
MUD([email protected]:6669); IRC([email protected]#ccl); }
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
