W dniu 07.02.2012 14:22, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
>
> Yes i did they use the AGPLv3 license and it states in de copyright file:
>
>  
>
> Linking:
>
> As a special exception to the AGPLv3, the Burp Project gives
> permission to link the code of its release of Burp with the OpenSSL
> project's "OpenSSL" library (or with modified versions of it that use
> the same license as the "OpenSSL" library), and distribute the linked
> executables.  You must obey the GNU Affero General Public License in
> all respects for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL".
>
>  
>

Ok. Thanks. I'll review it on the evening.

BTW you probably don't know dch tool from devscripts package, do you?
Using it you wouldn't have errors in date in your changelog entries ;)

7th February is *Tue*sday, and not *Thu*rsday ;)

regards
fEnIo

>  
>
>  
>
> *Van:*Bartosz Feński [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Verzonden:* dinsdag 7 februari 2012 14:19
> *Aan:* Bas van den Dikkenberg
> *CC:* [email protected]
> *Onderwerp:* Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and
> restore program.
>
>  
>
> W dniu 07.02.2012 13:43, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> I fixed the error isues
>
>  
>
> Could you please sponser a upload?
>
>  
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-3.dsc
>
>
> Did you contacted upstream about that SSL linking and this is their
> statement that you put in copyright file?
>
> regards
> fEnIo
>
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *Van:*Bas van den Dikkenberg
> *Verzonden:* maandag 6 februari 2012 16:08
> *Aan:* 'Bartosz Feński'
> *CC:* [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and
> restore program.
>
>  
>
> Working on it
>
>  
>
> *Van:*Bartosz Feński [mailto:[email protected]]
> <mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
> *Verzonden:* maandag 6 februari 2012 14:10
> *Aan:* Bas van den Dikkenberg
> *CC:* [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and
> restore program.
>
>  
>
> W dniu 06.02.2012 13:30, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
>
> I uploaded source en source files checks out.
>
>  
>
> But when lintian check over a build for example amd64 you get these
> warnings
>
>
> Yep... and I don't want them. Are you going to fix at least errors?
> Most warnings are also easily fixable.
>
> Are you going to work on it?
>
> W: burp: wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog usr/share/doc/burp/CHANGELOG.gz
>
> Remove changelog from docs file and install it with it debhelper script.
>
> E: burp: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
>
> This has to be clarified with upstream.
>
> W: burp: non-standard-file-perm etc/burp/burp-server.conf 0600 != 0644
> W: burp: non-standard-file-perm etc/burp/burp.conf 0600 != 0644
> W: burp: non-standard-dir-perm etc/burp/clientconfdir/ 0700 != 0755
> W: burp: non-standard-file-perm etc/burp/ssl_cert-client.pem 0600 != 0644
> W: burp: non-standard-file-perm etc/burp/ssl_cert-server.pem 0600 != 0644
> W: burp: non-standard-dir-perm var/spool/burp/ 0700 != 0755
>
> If this is for security reasons then override it for lintian.
>
> W: burp: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/burp/LICENSE.gz
>
> Not needed since it's license included in /usr/share/common-licenses
>
> E: burp: dir-or-file-in-var-run var/run/burp/
>
> Need to be created by start script.
>
> E: burp: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs
> etc/init.d/burp: required-start
> E: burp: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs
> etc/init.d/burp: required-stop
>
> start script needs to be fixed.
>
> W: burp: binary-without-manpage sbin/bedup
> W: burp: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/burp_ca
>
> Would be great to have it fixed, but it can be done later.
>
> W: burp: maintainer-script-empty preinst
>
> You can remove that file.
>
> regards
> fEnIo
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *Van:*Bartosz Feński [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Verzonden:* maandag 6 februari 2012 12:40
> *Aan:* Bas van den Dikkenberg; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and
> restore program.
>
>  
>
> W dniu 06.02.2012 12:13, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
>
> I have rebuild te package oke now ?
>
>  
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp
>
>  
>
> Not ok ;)
>
> There's no need to remove debian/* subdirectory from original tarball.
> Since 3.0 source format it's being overwritten automatically by the
> files from package_version.debian.tar.gz.
>
> This way it's easy to create non-native package and have orig.tar.gz
> unmodified.
>
> I run lintian over it and got shocked a little:
>
> fenio@zenbook ~/test $ lintian burp_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes
> W: burp: wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog usr/share/doc/burp/CHANGELOG.gz
> E: burp: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
> W: burp: non-standard-file-perm etc/burp/burp-server.conf 0600 != 0644
> W: burp: non-standard-file-perm etc/burp/burp.conf 0600 != 0644
> W: burp: non-standard-dir-perm etc/burp/clientconfdir/ 0700 != 0755
> W: burp: non-standard-file-perm etc/burp/ssl_cert-client.pem 0600 != 0644
> W: burp: non-standard-file-perm etc/burp/ssl_cert-server.pem 0600 != 0644
> W: burp: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/burp/LICENSE.gz
> E: burp: dir-or-file-in-var-run var/run/burp/
> W: burp: non-standard-dir-perm var/spool/burp/ 0700 != 0755
> E: burp: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs
> etc/init.d/burp: required-start
> E: burp: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs
> etc/init.d/burp: required-stop
> W: burp: binary-without-manpage sbin/bedup
> W: burp: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/burp_ca
> W: burp: maintainer-script-empty preinst
> fenio@zenbook ~/test $
>
> Have no idea why on http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp states
> "Package is Lintian clean".
>
> Try to fix these warnings and errors. Running lintian -i -v will give
> you more explanations.
>
> @Mentors: any hints why the page states that package is lintian clean?
>
> regards
> fEnIo
>
>
>
>  
>
> *Van:*Bas van den Dikkenberg
> *Verzonden:* maandag 6 februari 2012 11:31
> *Aan:* 'Bartosz Feński'
> *Onderwerp:* RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and
> restore program.
>
>  
>
> Oke i wil rebuild
>
>  
>
> *Van:*Bartosz Feński [mailto:[email protected]]
> <mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]>
> *Verzonden:* maandag 6 februari 2012 10:21
> *Aan:* [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and
> restore program.
>
>  
>
> W dniu 06.02.2012 09:11, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
>
> Becouse the source coms with complete set up as native source.
>
>  
>
> Including the all the stuff for packaging as debian package
>
>  
>
>
> That's not an explanation nor justification ;)
>
> You still should build is as a non-native package in such case.
>
> regards
> fEnIo
>
>
>
> Bas
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *Van:*Bartosz Feński [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Verzonden:* maandag 6 februari 2012 7:39
> *Aan:* [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and
> restore program.
>
>  
>
> W dniu 06.02.2012 00:36, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>  
>
> Dear mentors,
>
>  
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "burp".
>
>  
>
> * Package name    : burp
>
>    Version         : 1.3.0
>
>    Upstream Author : Graham Keeling <[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> * URL             : http://burp.grke.net/
>
> * License         : AGPLv3
>
>    Section         : utils
>
>  
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
>  
>
> burp  - backup and restore program
>
>  
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
>  
>
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp
>
>  
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
>  
>
>   dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0.dsc
>
>  
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
>  
>
>
> Why is it build as native package?
>
> regards
> fEnIo
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>

Reply via email to