In article <[email protected]>, Daniel Pocock<[email protected]> wrote: > On 21/05/12 19:35, Andy Hawkins wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:26:43PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> this was discussed on debian-mentors today - some lintian warnings are >>> not 100% reliable >> >> Yeah, I've been following that. >> >>> $ hardening-check flactag >>> flactag: >>> Position Independent Executable: yes >>> Stack protected: yes >>> Fortify Source functions: yes (some protected functions found) >>> Read-only relocations: yes >>> Immediate binding: yes >>> >>> $ hardening-check discid >>> discid: >>> Position Independent Executable: yes >>> Stack protected: no, not found! >> >> I think this is the key. The discid binary is so simple it may well not have >> a stack! The 'main' function is barely 10 lines long, and just instantiates >> a very simple class. >> > > I wonder if that is justification to make a lintian-override for that > warning? > >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
