On 2012-05-21 17:38, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 21/05/12 10:02, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> [...] >>> - - make a lintian override to suppress the warning, with a comment to >>> explain I am using -release deliberately for resiprocate? >> I'm not sure you want to keep the current names for the lib and the dev >> symlink (but if you do, then probably you should override the warning). >> > > Now I get exactly the type of filenames described in the manual: > http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Release-numbers.html#Release-numbers > > e.g. > usr/lib/librutil.so -> usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so > > The .0.0.0 suffixes are gone, but I still have the lintian warnings > > As this scenario is valid from the libtool manual, it is acceptable to > use the override for lintian? > >> [...]
Hi, As far as I can tell, you do not ship the symlink in the dev package (or any other package for that matter)[1], so in that sense, Lintian is right. That being said, Lintian does have a bug here, which should be fixed in commit 714b4ec[2]. ~Niels [1] $ find -name librutil.so ./rutil/.libs/librutil.so ./debian/tmp/usr/lib/librutil.so $ find -name librutil-1.8.so ./rutil/.libs/librutil-1.8.so ./debian/libresiprocate-1.8/usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so ./debian/tmp/usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commit;h=714b4ecdd59577792eac4006fc3b0b834bacb949 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
