On 11/6/12 5:13 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > a potential sponsor for reintroducing libpam-ssh asked me to contact you > as previous maintainer for comments on the reintroduction version, > which is meant to be a minimal version. > > A commented debdiff output is attached in such a way you can get quickly > a picture of this minimal version.
Looks fine to me, thanks for taking care of libpam-ssh! Cheers, /JP -- Jens Peter Secher <[email protected]> A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
