Hi Bart, Thank you for your reply.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Bart Martens <[email protected]> wrote: > I couldn't resist having a quick look now. :-) I suggest to ask > debian-release > for a pre-approval for wheezy with a debdiff including all three changes. So > I > suggest to keep the flag "needs sponsor" at mentors on "no" for now. > Fixing > 697276 (kmod) looks like a safe change that should be fixed in wheezy. Regarding the policy status, it will be refused. > On bug > 697275 I'm not sure, so you should doublecheck and doubletest that the change > does not change anything that has been fine in testing during the freeze so > far. Make sure that there's no regression at all. Already done. Bug reproduced before and fixed; I did several tests. > Bug 684592 should really be > fixed in wheezy, so it's even worth a separate upload for wheezy in my > opinion. > Depending on the outcome of debian-release you can go ahead with requesting > sponsorship for this package as-is (set "needs sponsor" to "yes") or do a > separate upload for wheezy with reduced changes you got pre-approval for. > Other changes are best uploaded to experimental, not to unstable, so that > unstable remains available for additional uploads for wheezy. More questions > best via debian-mentors, so other sponsors can help you faster than I can. ok; I can try sending a request with the debdiff and generate a package depending on the changes accepted. -- William -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJ75kXYX1DhvkZJB9fwir7SuR0KepAbgwiJmT=h46cn4j+m...@mail.gmail.com
