Hi Thibaut, > Can you explain why you chose to split the source? This forces you to > have astromenace only recommend astromenace-data, which is not good > since you can't play the game without the data.
I have at least three reasons for this: 1) It is more convenient in maintaining. Data files are changed rarely. There is no need to rebuild and re-upload huge package with them each time. 2) As I wrote earlier [1] package astromenace should recommend astromenace-data only at initial upload (to avoid circular dependencies). In next upload astromenace-data can be moved to dependencies. 3) IIRC buildd does not build packages in non-free area and pre-build binary packages should be uploaded into it manually. In this case binary packages will be available on less number of architectures than it should be possible. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/696385#19 Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/43821364372...@web11g.yandex.ru
