On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:38:56PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Hi Marwan,
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Marwan Tanager <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I'm a recent subscriber to the Debian mentors and developers lists, and I
> > notice that some ITP requests are sent to debian-devel against wnpp and
> > others
> > to debian-mentors against sponsorship-requests.
> >
> > Could someone please clarify under what conditions should ITP requests be
> > sent
> > to either lists and against either pseudo-packages, because the requests on
> > both lists look pretty similar?
>
> ITP bug reports are (or at least should) always be cc-ed to
> debian-devel; they can be filed by both DDs and non-DDs.
>
> Typically, package maintainers who are not either DDs or DMs, i.e. do
> not have upload rights to the Debian archive, will then file a RFS
> (request for sponsorship) bug report to ask for a DD to review and
> upload their package; these requests are always filed under the
> sponsorship-requests pseudo-package and cc-ed to debian-mentors.
Thanks, Vincent.
So, you're saying that if I've upload rights, I should file the report against
wnpp and cc debian-devel?
--
Marwan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130404034835.GD11424@host
