To test the theory that RFS activity may be limited more by accessibility than interest, I've made a sortable RFS table[1] showing RFS age, last comment age, number of comments, and a guess as to whether the RFS is waiting for reviewers or not. That should make it easier to identify requests most in need of review.
A quick analysis suggests that effective RFS review requires about one additional interaction every two years per debian-mentors subscriber. Early activity results[2] for September - RFS acceptances are up this month, from 1 to 14. The open RFS count has actually gone down down slightly, mostly due to an increased number of drops from mentors. Again, the home page for the data is at [3]. 1 - http://davesteele.github.io/debian-rfs-stats/discover.html?field=commentage&order=a 2 - http://davesteele.github.io/debian-rfs-stats/rfsactivity.html 3 - http://davesteele.github.io/debian-rfs-stats/ -- "Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien" - Voltaire -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOHcdNbSj1=t3siykt+gkhde8ucguqwxht_wo8u+xwccvpe...@mail.gmail.com
