---------------------------------------- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Is this really the debian way ? > Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:54:02 +0000 > > ---------------------------------------- >> To: [email protected] >> From: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Is this really the debian way ? >> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 15:10:26 +0000 >> >> On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben <[email protected]> wrote: >>> DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/ -V'libcjs0c (>= >>> $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)), libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS)' -- -c4 >> >> I don't see anything wrong here. It is not in the 'beginners end' of >> library packaging, and library packaging is not in the 'beginners end' >> of packaging. >> >> The more complex the libraries, the more complex you often need to be in >> your rules file. >> >> In this case, it ensures that anything that links libcjs0c ensures that >> it is installed along with the libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS) package. >> >> /Sune >> >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] >> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] >> > > Thanks for the explanation. > > Roelof >
One thing I find wierd. I looked at the sources of Fedora and Arch Linux and they do not use this trick. Can anyone explain this to me? Roelof -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
