[removing the RFS bug from the CC list and putting d-mentors@ldo] On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Eriberto <[email protected]> wrote: > 2014-09-02 15:16 GMT-03:00 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[email protected]>: >> On Seg, 01 Set 2014, Eriberto Mota wrote: >>> 1. d/changelog: add ACK for NMU. See details here[1]. >> I included the NMU changelog entry in debian/changelog (after my changes), >> is something else necessary? > See an example here: > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/g/gconjugue/unstable_changelog >
I'm not sure this needed (anymore?) The devref reads: "To acknowledge an NMU, include its changes and changelog entry in your next maintainer upload. If you do not acknowledge the NMU by including the NMU changelog entry in your changelog, the bugs will remain closed in the BTS but will be listed as affecting your maintainer version of the package." I totally don't understand what's the meaning of "the maintainer version of the package". Based of the BTS behaviour I saw, I'd say it collects the package's versions (so the package's history) from http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/$letter/$package/unstable_changelog. If you retain the entry for the NMU (you should) in the changelog, the BTS will contain to consider your package as fixed, even if you don't ack the NMU. Please enlighten me if I got this wrong :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB more about me: http://mapreri.org Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri Ubuntu Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cahkymes777-7wr60rvj01jd2qqwwug2hrvtj7f8rvljvz1a...@mail.gmail.com
