[CC me please] Hi,
I am trying to solve: https://bugs.debian.org/760874 Clearly my plan in the long term is to have src:openjpeg2 superseed src:openjpeg. However most package currently rely on src:openjpeg API to compile. src:openjpeg2 does break most package in debian archive. Would that be ok if I rename src:openjpeg2 binary packages to have a different name (technically even the cli tools from openjpeg have been renamed) from those of src:openjpeg ? This will make some users doing an upgrade (in the distant future) unhappy, but it will solve the current conflict. Any suggestion appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/ca+7wusyuxjnvkkbjtpoersr1yhpzkup+ngqviqq-b3ituw+...@mail.gmail.com
