On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Bill Blough wrote: > Probably so. And while it's an intriguing idea to think about, in my opinion > it defeats the purpose, since xalan is an xlst implementation that provides > an > alternative to libxslt.
I think I wasn't clear enough in my suggestion wording. I mean reimplement the libxslt approach for fixing this in libxalan-c rather than integrating libxslt into libxalan-c. PS: I'm subscribed. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6e6s4zcrkcvj_1opwykdtfvygs19yadea_t0v50yt-...@mail.gmail.com
