Your message dated Wed, 29 Oct 2014 22:22:17 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#766148: RFS: sleepenh/1.3.2 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766148,
regarding RFS: sleepenh/1.3-2 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
766148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sleepenh"
* Package name : sleepenh
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : was: Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[email protected]>, now: native
package
* License : GPL-2
Section : utils
It builds those binary packages:
sleepenh - Sleep until a given date with subsecond resolution
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/sleepenh
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sleepenh/sleepenh_1.3.2.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Use default debian/rules
* Add missing misc dependency to debian/control
* Set package source format to 3.0 (native); as agreed with original
upstream author (Pedro), sleepenh is not a native Debian package
* Makefile: use Debian compiler flags
* Makefile: use GNU install
* Update several Debian control files
* Bump to Debian Standards version 3.9.6
* New maintainer (Closes: #759732).
Regards,
Nicolas Schier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Am Dienstag, den 28.10.2014, 09:49 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Schier:
>
> Somehow debian/compat was still '5' yesterday evening; it is finally
> fixed now.
Yes, indeed.
Funny thing, I could have sworn it was 9 when I checked it yesterday; I
guess tired eyes ...
Ok, now I also understand why hardening was broken when I removed the
include of /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk: On compat = 9 this is not
required; Please remove it on a subsequent upload...
> > d/copyright: The years for debian/* are wrong. Pedro was maintaining
> > the packgage until 2008,
> > and for Files* the years are 2003-2008 (2008 is the year of the manpage)
> > (Sorry, I missed that before, please ping me again.)
>
> Thanks again for for your hints! Pedro's copyright years are fixed
> (2003-2008 for '*' and 'debian/*').
>
> > Please remove the template text from d/rules, so lines 3-12
> > I think you don't need to export DH_OPTIONS.
> You're right. Needless lines are now removed.
> Kind regards,
> Nicolas
Uploaded, many thanks!
--
tobi
--- End Message ---
