[I'm subscribed, no need to CC] On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
> Thanks guys. The confusion I'm concerned about in (2) is not the > library files themselves, but the package names. If we install > roccat-tools' liblua.so.2 to, say, /usr/lib/<arch>/roccat/liblua.so.2, > should it's package name just be liblua2, or something else? I can > imagine a Lua programming language developer mistakenly installing > roccat-tools' liblua2 package when they really want liblua5.2-0. This > is why I'm thinking that we might want to name the package something > like roccat-modules-lua2. I'd suggest bundling all of these libraries with the roccat-tools package, if they really need splitting out, your proposed naming (roccat-modules-)* sounds good. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6htao25u62aupyr9rydp5-q9ko2klmtlk4nl3jhqsa...@mail.gmail.com
