On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > Thus, it would feel odd to have a package named "git-tools" that contains > > only two tools of some note. > > OK, stick with git-restore-mtime as the binary package then. I'm wondering if > it would be better to call the source package git-mestrelion-tools...
Good idea, I've just done so. > > > While I'm at it, given that you're shipping extra manpages, wouldn't it be > > > worth it to ship the help2man-generated manpage as well, instead of > > > rebuilding it every time? > > > > I build it from source to make sure new upstream changes are incorporated. > > That's what I reckoned, although you'd still need to tweak the version number > in debian/rules every time. The version number is just something help2man wants, man works fine without. > > On the other hand, this makes it near impossible to adjust the output, and > > is inconsistent with the other three manpages, all of which are > > hand-crafted. Thus, you're probably right, it would be better to ship > > the manpage instead of building it from source. Done. > Shall I wait for that then before uploading? Should be ready now. However, mentors.d.n seems to not allow uploading the same binary package with a different source more than once per day (there's some cronjob AFAIK), so I had to use my own repository: http://angband.pl/debian/pool/main/g/git-mestrelion-tools/git-mestrelion-tools_1.0.0-1.dsc -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
