On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Please, avoid sending email in HTML.
> On 01/07/15 17:51, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > >look at the title ;) > >RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) > > > >no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. > > > >Cheers > > > >Fred > > > >>#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library > > Sure, because: > > *Changed Bug title to 'RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library' from 'RFS: > clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL BLAS library'*Request was from |Bart Martens > <ba...@quantz.debian.org>|to |cont...@bugs.debian.org|. (Wed, 01 Jul 2015 > 16:27:14 GMT) Full text > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=12;bug=790771>and rfc822 > format > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=12;bug=790771;mbox=yes>available. > > Which still leaves my original question: why ? Try opening one of the link you posted ↑ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790771;msg=12 I see that the package at mentors has version 2.4-1 so I retitle the RFS to match that version. And indeed 2.4-2 was uploaded only today, after this change. Btw, of course that's an automated email, by a service run by bartm to help keeping the RFS queue acceptable. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
