Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:29:22 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <855022376.2505729.1445066962197.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml
has caused the Debian Bug report #787861,
regarding RFS: polyml/5.5.2-1 [NMU] - interpreter and interactive compiler for
Standard ML
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
787861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787861
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "polyml"
* Package name : polyml
Version : 5.5.2-0.1
Upstream Author : David Matthews <pol...@polyml.org>
* URL : http://www.polyml.org
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Section : interpreters
It builds these binary packages:
libpolyml-dev - development files for Poly/ML, a compiler for Standard ML
libpolyml6 - runtime files for Poly/ML, a compiler for Standard ML
polyml - interpreter and interactive compiler for Standard ML
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/polyml
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/polyml/polyml_5.5.2-0.1.dsc
More information about polyml can be obtained from http://www.polyml.org.
Changes since the last upload:
* Non-maintainer upload
* New upstream version
* Removed libtool .la files
* Rename libpolyml1 to libpolyml6
* Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.6
* Bump up debian/compat to 9, and use dh_prep over dh_clean -k
* Enabled build hardening with dpkg-buildflags
* Made descriptions more consistent
The maintainer has not updated this package in years. Various people including
myself have attempted to contact the maintainer
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561763), but these have
failed, so I have packaged it myself to hopefully move things along.
Regards,
James Clarke
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi James,
I sponsored the package
(BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is
nice to be subscribed)
However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags in a future
release:
CXXFLAGS missing (-fPIE):
LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,now)
CFLAGS missing (-fPIE):
LDFLAGS missing (-fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,now)
you can see the full log here [1] or by using blhc tool
[1] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#unstable/polyml/5.5.2-1/blhc
cheers,
G.
--- End Message ---
