Hi Jakub, > * Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto <[email protected]>, 2015-11-30, 16:50: > >>That said, I wonder if there's any point in passing -V to > >>dh_makeshlibs if the package uses symbols. It doesn't seem useful. > > > >The option started to be used in version 2.4.1-1 (2008), > >I believe. From debian/changelog: > > > >* New upstream release (Closes: #480127): > > - Not bumping shlibs, no new symbol. > > - To achieve this, use two dh_makeshlibs calls (one for > > libgphoto2-port0 and one for libgphoto2-$(major), and provide with > > the last upstream version sharing the same ABI. Using 2.4.0 here > > although some former versions might have been specified. That > > shouldn't make any difference from a testing migration point of > > view. > > > >Do you know when the .symbols file started to be in use ? > > Symbol files wasn't very popular in 2008 yet. According to the > changelog, they were added much later: > > | libgphoto2 (2.4.10.1-1) experimental; urgency=low > | [...] > | [ David Paleino ] > | [...] > | * Added symbols files > | [...] > | > | -- David Paleino <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:19:03 +0100
:) > > I suppose -V should have been removed then. > Ok, I will do that. Thanks to look at that. regards, -- Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn)
