Hi Thomas
>It must be a standard NMU because like you said: there is no official link or >signed message from me that ack or review the changes. I'm not in a position >of >reviewing a package or signing something. (I'm in vacation on a sailboat >on the middle of the atlantic ocean.) >So I just give my permission for a NMU to Stefan if he found a sponsor for >reviewing his changes and made an upload. wonderful, take care of your vacation :) >Thanks for that. you are welcome! >I'm still agree for this NMU but beware: I did not review the changes of >Stefan in detail but I suppose you did before signing and uploading it in the >archive. yes, when I sign with my key I'm so pedantic about changes (this doesn't mean I can't do mistakes, but if you look at -mentors you will hardly find an upload where I didn't make a deep review of the packaging) >Thank you Stefan for testing and taking care of Clementine and libechonest. >Thank you Gianfranco for this NMU. thanks to you for allowing it in the first place (well, I could have tested the symbols in a porter machine, but I wasn't honestly aware of this arm* delta, and honestly I wasn't aware of dpkg 1.18 not available on buildd machines, so some uploads were good, but only where a recent enough dpkg was available (*outside* the chroot, not inside). sorry for that! cheers, Gianfranco
