-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi,
I had the same results [1] using Chromium (Sid) ca-certificates 20151214 chromium 47.0.2526.80-3 [1] NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID regards. []'s kretcheu :x Em 24-12-2015 11:05, Jakub Wilk escreveu: > * Cindy-Sue Causey <[email protected]>, 2015-12-23, 19:35: >> Hi.. I'm a lurker here hoping to learn how to help you all by osmosis of >> your interactions on this list. I just played along and went to the above >> site. Received this on Iceweasel: >> >> +++ >> mentors.debian.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is >> not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown. >> (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer) >> +++ >> >> I don't know if it has any bearing or not but, during a recent near daily >> upgrade, I just accidentally happened to actually "see and (almost) grasp >> the significance" that ca-certificates was upgraded in the last few days. A >> quick grep through /var/log/apt shows that was just the 20th (~3 days ago >> per my term.log). Would that maybe play any part in this? > > Iceweasel doesn't use ca-certificates, so I don't think this upgrade had any > effect on it. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWfFLkAAoJEDnxel9a775zr10P/A+c0PfXVY3GePB2zqo+q093 nB1ugLvCFD086YxgsFZDVwrDpPwfB+Zo2e2r+tvrOb5i75CQQliHzlAOQ6RviomT AiDoCWOrE40wUaFNPqUUeDHLXFlH7vNJLi7Yp18/Nyqp8LT7N34GULkgXsgZwDoM flxQ3kAlcTGsUq7jghyrqzhDAnHe+25XQ3pt3sBkpyHonE6folfW1hR8hGvN3Q5S 0ra3KsgZOve0VoRhvgP/TtVp28LOUAnneok7L1m0n5ELRaYhHm2oC75Q/6h0FW7l 0fc5fiA9bMAwBDBVTbElSwGkIeCIYFy6MgSkY1LT/AloGdHCM/YiE0oBOzAr5L+N untmWZ+xd6tqYFgdrF1Hba8qDXmAs4DKKs1GNZzR5Lp5Sh3Ij9VxAIGWZYm87Ahd I0SjULQWLVJ5v69t/8K4HoHV9MC2w7ayzrRDlFSrVcMjiWGI2jRc9ZVNAsSM4oYt kvv0+9N1HLX/bFaK8zndE+ehOoYgNKsI521dHQS11u5qjf9cCwwVxs9nBebt4Kck 0irSNk8685MISXAZvoEylz9FiDRsF6rtsbtC8PHue+ukzSaL+DkFe5cryQ7tgn9H qE+pYG9p+R4wzOPAAUrYFkqZ95XpddZ8LX+4KWMSSAjeNi4qQ6GPDvd+Wi2FJu+a c9s6tnYDZrPlEcILHVOh =Aj3W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
