Hi, thanks for the answers to my previous question about Multi-Arch. Incidentially the next packaging of libburn will happen soon, because of an embarrassing bug in its command line frontend cdrskin.
This leads me to my next first-time situation: There is now upstream libburn-1.4.2.pl01.tar.gz which replaces libburn-1.4.2.tar.gz Despite the tarball name it unpacks to ./libburn-1.4.2/. The effective difference is a single line of source code (plus some logging and online documentation files). The binary package which actually bears the bug is cdrskin_1.4.2-1. Am i right that in this case all packages from libburn_1.4.2-1.dsc shall be rebuilt ? Shall i keep the name scheme by packaging 1.4.2-2 from the buggy libburn-1.4.2.tar.gz with a debian/patch file ? Or shall i package 1.4.2.pl01-1 without patch ? At the last such occasion, more than 4 years ago, George Danchev packaged 1.1.0.pl01-1. Have a nice day :) Thomas
