On 29/02/16 23:09, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > sorry, this took awfully long. > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:09:20PM +0000, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >> Amanda have release a new upstream version. My main sponsor is too >> busy for helping me. So I am searching for someone that can help >> sponsor the new release. > Ok, I can do it.
Thank you.
> Should I use the git repository?
Yes. I just have upload one more patch to fix a nasty bug in amanda 3.3.8.
In the next days I will work through your task list.
> Just looking through cgit, I can ask you the following things:
>
> * https in Vcs-Git please
> * standards-version to 3.9.7
> * version restriction on tar can go away, and tar being essential:yes
> the whole dep can go away
> * are you sure the perl dep is needed? ${perl:Depends} ought to do it
> * guessing you are using git-buildpackage, why didn't you just
> `gbp import-dsc` to import the NMU?
> * please push the tag for the upstream part
> * you have a build-dep on debhelper version >= 9, but you use compat 5.
> please bump the compat, after checking the differences in debhelper(7)
> * the *.dirs files don't need to list directories for files installed by
> other dh_* things, so I'm confident at least line 3,4,5 of
> amanda-server.dirs are useless, haven't looked at the others
> * I'm not happy with the old style rules file, but guess I can't ask
> that much in this case, and I can live well with it anyway :)
>
> ↑ that's the kind of things I want to see changed for me to sponsor it.
> If you confirm I should look at the git repository and you're ok with me
> as a sponsor please confirm so (and fix the already reported problems,
> please ;))
>
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
