> I don't know enough about the python-qtawesome package to tell whether
> python-xstatic-font-awesome is equivalent functionality-wise.


Me too :)

> I don't expect it to be an easy pitch to ask the Spyder team to
> rethink their dependency chain just for the sake of re-usability.
> Unless you had a different reason in mind?

No thi si sjuste that I do not want duplication in the Debina archive.
so maybe this qtaesome code is almost equivalent to the 
python-xstatic-font-aweosme.
I need to investigate :)

> Besides, what about the elusive fonts?

I am on it And I think that it will be an easy task :)

I already asked to become part of the pkg-fonts team today :)

Cheers

Fred

> FYI, I have upgraded the packaging with the latest upstream version
> (0.3.1). Shall I upload it to mentors?

If you want :)

Cheers

Fred

Reply via email to