On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 07:55:18AM -0400, Ulf Carlsson wrote: > I think the convention is: > > mips = big endian > mipsel = little endian > > These packages I've built are for big endian MIPS machines. Maybe I should > have > compiled for both mips and mipsel, so that we can get two ports. It wouldn't > be > much problem to build mipsel at the same time as I build mips, I'd just have > to > type dpkg-buildpackage one more time. I have to compile new set of glibc, > egcs > and binutils first though. It would be pointless to have one person working > on > mips and one person on mipsel. We would probably have to make the same > changes, > thus duplicating work.
> I would have to tweak a some things to make dpkg-buildpackage -a build the > packages to have the name mipseb (since the tools have the prefix mips-linux > and > not mipseb-linux) but if you have a nice solution and find it necessary, I can > certainly change it. Hmmm - ok - i thought it had been mipseb Currently it seems our work is incompatible as i have decstations which are pure little endian ... Flo -- Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5241-470566 Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three). (RFC 1925)
