FYI
----- Forwarded message from David Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by paradigm.rfc822.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 9D9129002; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:14:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from news.rdc1.tx.home.com (ha2.rdc1.tx.home.com [24.4.0.67])
by noose.gt.owl.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64937D9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:10:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from c67032-a.grlnd1.tx.home.com ([24.4.50.152])
by news.rdc1.tx.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 09:10:30 -0700
Received: by c67032-a.grlnd1.tx.home.com
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 11:17:38 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 11:17:38 -0500
From: David Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mipsel patch for ld.so
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre4i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Oct 20, 1999
at 07:30:14PM -0500
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 07:30:14PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 06:05:13PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > could you integrate this patch into ld.so - It solves the ld.so
> > segfault of ldconfig on mipsel (Probably mips also).
>
> OK. I'll add it in the next release.
Done in 1.9.11-5.
David
--
David Engel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5241-470566
... The failure can be random; however, when it does occur, it is
catastrophic and is repeatable ... Cisco Field Notice
