On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Yes, it was an interesting experience to see 'FATAL: kernel too old' when > > trying to run bash. :) My next step is to boot the machine to 2.2 > > (2.4?) so I can continue with configuring the chroot'ed system.
> I guess you'll see that message too booting 2.2 although i never saw > a 2.2 kernel for the Cobalts. Hmm, I haven't seen a 2.2 kernel for it yet, either. So far, the 2.4 kernels I've built complain about 'spurious interrupts' and never make it past mounting filesystems. Slow progress, but progress. > > Are your mips/mipsel machines faster at compiling than ours is? I admit > > that > > I'm very impatient when waiting for compiles, having been spoiled by fast > > x86 and alpha systems. I'm sure that if it's as much hassle as you say, > > I'll > > soon give up and learn to tolerate the slow builds, but I'm still going to > > try > > cross-building if only for my own purposes. > I dont think mine are much faster - The mipsel machines we currently > build on are 250Mhz R5000 with 128M and the Big Endian autobuilder > is currently 100MHz R4400 with 64M although the Indigo2 has > 128M and a 250Mhz R4400 but the disk corruption is worse on the Indigo2 > due to multiple disks. Well, I don't know our system specs, and don't remember a way to find the processor speed with a 2.0 kernel. I can say, however, that OpenSSL cross-builds pleasantly fast on my Pentium II 333. Cross-building multi-library source packages this way still fails due to some issues with dpkg-cross, but I'll see if I can't hammer those out. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
