> Not to pester you again, but I use that file and it only drives the > monitor at 60hz when displaying 1280x1024. I looked at the driver a bit, > but I didn't see anything offhand that would indicate that it could pass > that the pixel clock rate, etc... from the configuration file directly to > the driver. > > I'll take another look today and check it out, but it would be very cool > to have it run at the maximum pixel clock for that resolution. ;-)
Uhm... you quite possibly are. I have an Indigo2 with XZ graphics, which is a step up from XL/Newport (e.g. bigger, better, more expensive) and it is absolutely impossible to achieve more than 72 Hz with it, at 1280x1024 or otherwise. In fact, even the IMPACT graphics boards won't do more than 72 Hz AFAIK. So I'd be quite willing to believe that the XL board can't handle more than 60 Hz. Sorry. :( - Michael ===== MIPS: 64-bit since 1992 DEC Alpha: 64-bit since 1992 PowerPC: 64-bit since 1994 UltraSPARC: 64-bit since 1995 PA-RISC: 64-bit since 1996 Intel: Trying to catch up in 2001? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com
