On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 08:15:46PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > i am getting repeated requests for accounts on mips/mipsel machines. > > > > As for mipsel both machines (remake & repeat) say in their motd to use > > the other machine. > > Clever :) > > This will, hopefully, solved by vaughan and williams once they run > sufficiently. It's a looong story.. > > > As for mips this is easy - I do have another machine (reset.rfc822.org) > > which is up and running so we do not need to disturb the mips buildds. > > > > I'd like to discuss the policy on where i should create such accounts. > > Your former policy to create accounts on demand for porters was fine. > Any reason to not continue this for reset? It's better when the porter > is a DD but if it is a known mips guy that was fine as well.
We should definitly - I could also attach more disks to reset. It
currently has
reset:~# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 1942100 498844 1344600 28% /
/dev/sdb1 4374312 469220 3682888 12% /scratch
I guess someone should set up some build-roots for interested partys.
Also we could migrate all accounts from resume and reconfig.
As for mipsel we should decide what to do - A clear policy would make it
easier to quickly setup accounts. Also we should migrate them all to a
single machine.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134
Heisenberg may have been here.
pgp1uk37VXI1l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
