Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > Florian Lohoff a écrit : >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:55:47AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>>> Selfmade or Debian kernel ? >>> Well if the machine is running Etch, a 2.6.18 kernel is available. >>> Otherwise that would probably mean a self-made kernel or an upgrade to Etch. >>> >>> If it does not fix the problem it could be a good idea to ask on >>> linux-mips too. >> The question was which kernel did survive your build on mips and mipsel. >> > > Oops, sorry. > > Here are the kernels I tested during the development of the 2.5 package: > - linux-image-2.6.18-4-qemu (mips) > - linux-image-2.6.18-4-qemu (mipsel) > - linux-image-2.6.18-2-r5k-cobalt > - linux-image-2.6.18-2-r5k-cobalt rebuilt with 64-bit enabled > - linux-image-2.6.18-3-r4k-ip22 > - 2.6.17.8-ip22 (hand built) on casals.d.o > > Note also that the same problem appears on ball, the mips build daemon, > which if I remember correctly is using the same Broadcom board. >
I have been told on #mipslinux that all the machines where I tried it were UP machine, while the SB1 are all SMP ones. If somebody has access to a mips or mipsel SMP machine which is not an SB1 machine, could you please try to build the glibc from unstable (2.5-2 or later) on it? Thanks Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
