Hi Lee and Martin, This call trace looks similar to the one I just reported against 2.6.25-rc5. Martin, do you think it is the same?
Il giorno mer, 12/03/2008 alle 18.09 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Ok here you go, it seemed like there was more when I was using the graphical > console. > > CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address > 0000000000000000, > epc == 98000000013f1160, ra == 98000000013f1160 > Oops[#1]: [...] > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8028e544>] cdrom_open+0x3b4/0xf70 > [<ffffffff800b6cf4>] d_kill+0x84/0xa8 > [<ffffffff800ad67c>] link_path_walk+0x154/0x298 > [<ffffffff800ad668>] link_path_walk+0x140/0x298 > [<ffffffff801df9d8>] kobject_get+0x20/0x38 > [<ffffffff801d4768>] get_disk+0x88/0xc0 > [<ffffffff801d47b0>] exact_lock+0x10/0x28 > [<ffffffff80285208>] sr_block_open+0xb8/0x138 > [<ffffffff800d6558>] blkdev_open+0x0/0xc0 > [<ffffffff800d6050>] do_open+0x98/0x328 > [<ffffffff800d6558>] blkdev_open+0x0/0xc0 > [<ffffffff800d65a0>] blkdev_open+0x48/0xc0 > [<ffffffff8009dcd4>] __dentry_open+0x104/0x2a8 > [<ffffffff8009dfa8>] do_filp_open+0x48/0x58 > [<ffffffff8009dfa8>] do_filp_open+0x48/0x58 > [<ffffffff8009dadc>] get_unused_fd+0x5c/0x150 > [<ffffffff8009e01c>] do_sys_open+0x64/0x130 > [<ffffffff8001ba68>] handle_sys+0x128/0x144 > [<ffffffff800a4628>] sys_readlink+0x0/0x18 > [<ffffffff8005fcf3>] sys_init_module+0x882/0x1b28 Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
