Am 2010-06-03 13:23, schrieb Shane McDonald: > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Willi Mann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Could anyone with a testing/unstable mipsel box please download the current >> enigmail sources and try to compile it? I'd like to know whether the build >> error message "Bus error" is a temporary problem on this buildd or a >> permanent problem. >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=enigmail;ver=2%3A1.0.1-2;arch=mipsel;stamp=1275423629 > > I just tried building it in a sid pbuilder on a mipsel box running the > 2.6.34 kernel, > and I see it crash in the exact same place. With my system, though, > it reports a "Segmentation fault" rather than a "Bus error". > > inflating: > debian/enigmail/usr/lib/xul-ext/enigmail/platform/Linux_/components/libenigmime-.so > inflating: debian/enigmail/usr/lib/xul-ext/enigmail/chrome.manifest > inflating: debian/enigmail/usr/lib/xul-ext/enigmail/install.rdf > Segmentation fault > make[1]: *** [override_dh_install] Error 139 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/enigmail-1.0.1' > make: *** [binary] Error 2 > dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status > 2 > > Looks like a permanent problem, rather than a temporary buildd problem.
Thank you, this is interesting. In the mean time, I've set up a qemu mipsel installation running 2.6.26, where it also ends with "Bus error". So I found out that the "Bus error" problem happens in a python library, python-rdflib. (Bug#584327) I'm now trying to find out which package's fault it is. It could even be a now fixed compiler problem, because a test case I created succeeds with a rebuilt rdflib (albeit with noopt). WM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
