On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:33:42 (CEST), Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:59:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:52:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >> > I think that's a misconfiguration of the buildds. They're supposed to >> > put linux32 into the schroot configuration if the kernel arch differs >> > from the userspace arch, to get the right entry into uname. >> Negative. The build have to work with even a complete different kernel >> architecture. > > Since when do we require this? I don't think we do that. It might be a goal, > which you are free to propose. (Mainly useful to build the right packages > on i386 userland with an amd64 kernel.) The status quo is that such build > failures are not RC, AFAIK.
In the mean time, I've uploaded this patch: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=commitdiff;h=27301ced78552bd4a95a9502cb67acd58b3fd297 As far I understand this discussion, it is no longer necessary. Please tell me if I should revert it, or if it is a good idea nevertheless. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
