On 06/08/2013 11:24 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Matt Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 7:23 PM, YunQiang Su <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Matt Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:54 AM, YunQiang Su <[email protected]> wrote:
Any idea about is there another distribution has n32 or n64 port, and
at the same time that multilib is supported?
Yes, Gentoo. We do the standard o32 -> lib, n32 -> lib32, n64 -> lib64.
Is there a port to n32 or n64 of gentoo?
On n32 or n64 port, is it fit to put o32 libraries into lib directly?
Yes, I have n32-multilib (n32 base system, and n64 and o32 glibc and
gcc libraries) and n64. o32 goes in lib regardless of the ABI of the
base system.
It is not forbid to put o32 libraries to /lib in mips64 port in policy
(Fix me if I am wrong).
OK: I think you are wrong here.
o32 libraries must go in /lib and /usr/lib as Matt and I have already
told you.
If the mips64 port policy disagrees with this, then the policy is
incorrect and must be changed.
While as ldso will always looks for /lib and /usr/lib/, thus if we put
it in /libo32,
No, I think you misunderstand how ld.so works.
ld.so looks in the proper directories already, and functions perfectly
with the library directories named as Matt and I have told you.
it will still work and packages built on other distributions(like
packages converted by alian).
And the Debian package would not work on other distributions where
/libo32 is not supported,
Since we have multiarch support, this is not a big problem ;)
If you are using multi-arch, then all of this is moot. You need to use
the proper multi-arch directories instead.
David Daney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
